Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

Yeah, the second one could have been really cool if they'd gone with the whole idea of his mom being a Paladin and having to hunt down her Jumper son. That would have been a really interesting story.

I Am Jedi
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/6228/lsmu.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

I think Hayden just want more movie for the second movie then they thought he was worth.

http://imageshack.us/a/img26/9664/newjestersigfinal.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

i guess

http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/3416/renegadeprincejpg.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

I can see that happening.

"WHAT?! You're only gonna pay me this much to do a sequel?! Don't you know that I did STAR WARS!!!!"

Haha lol  lol  lol  lol

By the way, look where his career has gone compared to Natalie Portman and Ewan McGregor. He hasn't really made much noise, especially compared with Portman lately.

Last edited by Lightside Master (2011-09-16 10:23:55)

I Am Jedi
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/6228/lsmu.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

That's true but he is not that good of actor either.

http://imageshack.us/a/img26/9664/newjestersigfinal.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

No he isn't. Star Wars just remains as his best movie.

https://s32.postimg.org/8xe25ip4l/George_Kwei_2.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

True but even if he never acts again he can always say that he played Anikan Skywalker in Star Wars.

http://imageshack.us/a/img26/9664/newjestersigfinal.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

Anikan could have been so much cuter...

http://tinyurl.com/cyxnotmhttp://tinyurl.com/bs6edlz

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

I guess but Padma could have been way hotter too.

http://imageshack.us/a/img26/9664/newjestersigfinal.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

No, I find Natalie Portman very pretty.

https://s32.postimg.org/8xe25ip4l/George_Kwei_2.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

When I think of Padma I think of Padma off of Top Chef not a skinny white girl.

http://imageshack.us/a/img26/9664/newjestersigfinal.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

Hahaha, nice. I think Hayden looked the part of Anakin, but didn't do a real good job of acting it.

I Am Jedi
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/6228/lsmu.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

George Kwei wrote:

No he isn't. Star Wars just remains as his best movie.

what are you saying?? he was garbage in star wars! jumper was so much better!

http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/3416/renegadeprincejpg.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

I agree because Star Wars was his big brake and he was not ready for a role like that but after he played Anakin and got the XP in acting he really came into his own in Jumper.

http://imageshack.us/a/img26/9664/newjestersigfinal.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

Yeah, I think he did get better. I also agree that he was not at all ready for the role of Anakin. I think it would have been interesting if they could have reworked the time line and used a different actor for Episode I, then kept him for all three movies.

I Am Jedi
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/6228/lsmu.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

i mean honestly...the only person who could have done a worse job then hayden is like....ashton kutcher.

http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/3416/renegadeprincejpg.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

Ashton only gets jobs because he is married to Demi Moore and that's the only reason.

http://imageshack.us/a/img26/9664/newjestersigfinal.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

Darth Jester wrote:

Ashton only gets jobs because he is married to Demi Moore and that's the only reason.

^^^^ *like*

http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/3416/renegadeprincejpg.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

Do you agree?

http://imageshack.us/a/img26/9664/newjestersigfinal.jpg

Re: 2 YEARS ON THE SITE!!!!!!!!

He isn't so bad... he's... mostly cute. smile

http://tinyurl.com/cyxnotmhttp://tinyurl.com/bs6edlz